We explore real-life reformation here in this informed, online community.
It has long been understood that the New York Times is the public voice of the American intelligence establishment, and that American media takes its cues from the Times on what should or should not be reported. In 2025, the Times stopped lying about two aspects of the Ukrainian war, and the about-face has shaken the world. On March 9th, the Times admitted that it was America which made war against Russia, for decades, falsely pretending that Russia was an aggressor against Ukraine. This previous narrative was fake war propaganda all along.
Now comes another truth bomb from the Times: Zelenskii is no Messiah, but a highly accomplished crook who cares nothing about the suffering of Ukrainians.
On December 5th, the Times proved that the hero-status they had once given Zelenskii was another fake narrative created by the deep state for the purposes of extending billions of dollars of aid to the most corrupt money-laundering nation in the world.
For further reading:
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/ukrainian-corruption-scandal-likely?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
Rod Dreher asks, "I don’t understand why the government doesn’t deploy the army and shoot rioters until they stop. Philippe Lemoine, a Frenchman, says it’s not that simple."
Excerpt:
"We have let things rot for so long that, at this point, relying primarily on force to restore order would require a degree of violence far greater than what people realize and what is politically feasible.
It's possible to contain a riot using only moderate force when the number of police officers is high relative to the number of rioters, but when riots are so widespread and involve so many people because you have allowed this kind of things to happen for so long, that's just not possible and you have to use extreme violence to make up for the lack of manpower.
I know people on the Internet will say that it doesn't matter and that we should just do it, but the reality is that most of the people in charge are not prepared to use that kind of force and neither would most ordinary people if they saw ...
Even Marine Le Pen’s recent statements track this line: personal Islamic practice is compatible with the Republic; replacing French law with Sharia is not. French Muslims who are simply citizens practicing their "religious faith" “have no reason to worry” about a Le Pen election victory.
But can one be a practicing Muslim without demanding and practicing Sharia?
