We explore real-life reformation here in this informed, online community.
Ninth Circuit Decision is Win for Second Amendment
Affirming the district court’s grant of a permanent injunction, the panel held that California’s ammunition background check regime, which requires firearm owners to complete background checks before each ammunition purchase, facially violates the Second Amendment. The panel applied the two-step framework set forth in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), in assessing plaintiffs’ Second Amendment challenge.
Applying the first step, the panel held that California’s ammunition background check regime implicates the plain text of the Second Amendment because the regime meaningfully constrains the right to keep operable arms.
Applying the second step, the panel held that the government failed to carry its burden of showing that California’s ammunition background check regime “is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.” The historical analogues proffered by California were not within the relevant time frame, nor were they relevantly similar to California’s ammunition background check regime.
The “Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom” was a law passed by the Virginia General Assembly in 1786 that protected the rights of its citizens to worship as they chose.
The bill was originally drafted by Thomas Jefferson in 1779. Some years after the passage of the Statute, Jefferson wrote that during the earlier debate in the General Assembly there had been an effort to limit the protection to Christians. However, this effort was defeated, showing that, as Jefferson noted, “it’s protection of opinion was meant to be universal.” He wrote:
Where the preamble declares that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed, by inserting the word “Jesus Christ,” so that it should read “a departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion” the insertion was rejected by a great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of it’s [sic] protection, the Jew and the ...
In the face of reality, and in the presence of those who know the details of the destructive proxy war, the narrative of the media is worse than ludicrous:
Ukraine can win the war with just a little more American money and a few more guns.
Trump: “So I asked Orbán if Ukraine could defeat Russia.
"He looked at me as if I had said something very stupid. And he said that Russia is a huge country. They fight, that’s what they do. China beats you with trade; Russia beats you with war."
Having read the writings and speeches of Orban, I would imagine there was much more to Orban's answer. I think Orban would have reminded Trump of Putin's historic intent: defend Russian national security interests in way that would prove to Zelensky that an offensive and provocative war could never succeed. Ukraine had provoked and invaded Russia. Russia was determined to defend herself.
This Zelensky realized by day five, and was eager to get to the negotiating table to stop the ...
