We explore real-life reformation here in this informed, online community.
It's a new Iron Curtain. Six German men and two German women, citizens on paper, tried to leave their homeland for a congress of European minds, the “Remigration Summit” in Italy, a gathering meant to discuss the restoration of harmony between land and lineage.
But they were stopped at a German airport, interrogated for hours, and then banned from going anywhere internationally for two days. By bureaucrats with badges.
The official reason? “They might damage Germany’s international reputation” if they happened to say anything in Italy about what was really going on back home in Germany.
Writes Constantine Von Hoffmeister:
"Free speech, that ancient contract between citizen and state, has become conditional. You may speak but only if your words wear velvet gloves. You may think but only if your thoughts arrive sterilized. You may question but only inside the margins drawn by Davos. And if you dare to assemble across jurisdictional lines with others who refuse the narrative, the exit point becomes a trap. To leave becomes subversion. To travel becomes threat. This is Germany now — a land once torn by a wall of concrete, now ruled by walls made of ideology and algorithm. The surveillance is softer, the chains more invisible, yet the prison more complete. How many minds will wither in silence because they fear that even thinking wrong will mark them?"
Precious in the sight of the LORD Is the death of His godly ones.
Psalm 116:15
Rod Dreher asks, "I don’t understand why the government doesn’t deploy the army and shoot rioters until they stop. Philippe Lemoine, a Frenchman, says it’s not that simple."
Excerpt:
"We have let things rot for so long that, at this point, relying primarily on force to restore order would require a degree of violence far greater than what people realize and what is politically feasible.
It's possible to contain a riot using only moderate force when the number of police officers is high relative to the number of rioters, but when riots are so widespread and involve so many people because you have allowed this kind of things to happen for so long, that's just not possible and you have to use extreme violence to make up for the lack of manpower.
I know people on the Internet will say that it doesn't matter and that we should just do it, but the reality is that most of the people in charge are not prepared to use that kind of force and neither would most ordinary people if they saw ...
Even Marine Le Pen’s recent statements track this line: personal Islamic practice is compatible with the Republic; replacing French law with Sharia is not. French Muslims who are simply citizens practicing their "religious faith" “have no reason to worry” about a Le Pen election victory.
But can one be a practicing Muslim without demanding and practicing Sharia?
