We explore real-life reformation here in this informed, online community.
How a State House Swamp Leader Stays in Power:
Assemble a small, loyal coalition – A handful of members whose support is essential to win leadership votes and control the chamber.
Control the agenda – Decide what gets a vote, when, and under what rules. If a bill doesn’t help you or your loyalists, it never sees daylight.
Access to money and favors – State budgets, committee chairmanships, staff, campaign cash, and donor networks—all tools to reward loyalty.
Dole Out Punishments – Drop a hammer on a member who is exposing the playbook to remind everyone who’s boss. State Freedom Caucuses have been routinely targeted in this regard.
Keep the majority broke and scared – Most members are told that they have no real power (This is a lie). Keep them dependent on leadership for their bills and re-election.
Use complexity as a weapon – Procedural chaos and backroom deals make it hard for outsiders (and even most members) to understand what’s happening.
Avoid transparency and reform – Sunshine and open rules shift power away from the top. Can’t have that if you’re the Swamp.
Gaslight the Public - In typical Orwellian fashion, the Swamp will twist words to make their agenda sound amazing while they fleece your pocketbook and restrict your liberties. Check out http://SwampGlossary.com for examples.
Use performative bills to create noise – Run a flashy bill that won’t pass just to give members something to campaign on—while real decisions are made behind closed doors. This is also used to confuse the members into thinking the Swamp Speaker "isn't a bad guy because he let me run my bill."
Use media allies or influencers – Give scoops, leaks, or access to sympathetic outlets. Reward reporters who toe the line. Freeze out the ones who ask tough questions.
Andy Roth
--James 2:12
GK Chesterton on adultery:
"The revolt against vows has been carried in our day even to the extent of a revolt against the typical vow of marriage. It is most amusing to listen to the opponents of marriage on this subject. They appear to imagine that the ideal of constancy was a yoke mysteriously imposed on mankind by the devil, instead of being, as it is, a yoke consistently imposed by all lovers on themselves. They have invented a phrase, a phrase that is a black and white contradiction in two words - ‘free-love' - as if a lover ever had been, or ever could be, free.
"It is the nature of love to bind itself, and the institution of marriage merely paid the average man the compliment of taking him at his word. Modern sages offer to the lover, with an ill-favored grin, the largest liberties and the fullest irresponsibility; but they do not respect him as the old Church respected him; they do not write his oath upon the heavens, as the record of his highest moment. ...
Opinion by Lau Vegys:
America's problems aren't fixable with patriotic sentiment. They're mathematical realities that don't care about your flag-waving.
The national debt recently hit $37 trillion. By 2033—the same year Social Security's trust fund runs dry—we're looking at debt exceeding $50 trillion. Interest payments alone will consume nearly half of all tax revenue.
At that point, the Federal Reserve will have no choice but to print tens of trillions of dollars to bail out the Treasury. The resulting inflation will make the early 1980s look like a picnic.
And of course, as I mentioned in a recent piece, whether it's $37 trillion now or $50 trillion in about eight years, the headline number is just the tip of the iceberg.
Add it all up—Medicare, Social Security, federal pensions, and other off-the-books promises—and the real financial hole the U.S. government faces is closer to $150 trillion. That’s nearly $1 million per taxpayer.
The Guardian reports that 15,000 Afghans were relocated to the UK in a secret scheme, while Breitbart reported that nearly 24,000 Afghans were brought in, with the British government earmarking £7 billion to secretly house and import them.
The UK taxpayer has no choice but to pay up, while government transparency was lacking.
Whether all these Afghans were vetted remains unknown. Given the reputation of the UK along with many Western countries, the vetting process for migrants is nearly nonexistent, and highly questionable in this case in particular.
Also, in the spring of 2023, while Rishi Sunak was prime minister and many UK military families had no heat or hot water, the government continued to host illegal migrants in plush hotels, at the cost to taxpayers of $8.5 million USD a day and rising. And while homelessness was up over 27% in Britain, illegal, mostly Muslim migrants from the Middle East and Africa, were royally served in those plush hotels. Now it comes to light that in...
