We explore real-life reformation here in this informed, online community.
"Trump openly doubts Europe’s loyalty, his voice ringing with contempt: “If we were attacked, I don’t believe they’d be there.” America stands alone, facing a truth that Europe refuses to admit: the NATO alliance, once sacred, is now a meaningless, decrepit structure — an ancient temple whose priests chant rituals no one remembers, long abandoned by their indifferent gods. The president rejects the naive belief in Europe’s goodwill, seeing through their empty promises...[understanding] too late that trust in corrupted institutions is a path to ruin.
"Musk...slashes away at bureaucratic waste, cutting the tumorous growths of institutional excess. His statement urging withdrawal from NATO and the United Nations ignites a wave of support among MAGA loyalists, bold revolutionaries refusing to serve cults masquerading as alliances."
-- Constantin Von Hoffmeister
Precious in the sight of the LORD Is the death of His godly ones.
Psalm 116:15
Rod Dreher asks, "I don’t understand why the government doesn’t deploy the army and shoot rioters until they stop. Philippe Lemoine, a Frenchman, says it’s not that simple."
Excerpt:
"We have let things rot for so long that, at this point, relying primarily on force to restore order would require a degree of violence far greater than what people realize and what is politically feasible.
It's possible to contain a riot using only moderate force when the number of police officers is high relative to the number of rioters, but when riots are so widespread and involve so many people because you have allowed this kind of things to happen for so long, that's just not possible and you have to use extreme violence to make up for the lack of manpower.
I know people on the Internet will say that it doesn't matter and that we should just do it, but the reality is that most of the people in charge are not prepared to use that kind of force and neither would most ordinary people if they saw ...
Even Marine Le Pen’s recent statements track this line: personal Islamic practice is compatible with the Republic; replacing French law with Sharia is not. French Muslims who are simply citizens practicing their "religious faith" “have no reason to worry” about a Le Pen election victory.
But can one be a practicing Muslim without demanding and practicing Sharia?
