It will take a good fifteen-twenty years, but you simply trick the small nation. Overthrow their government. Propagandize their minds. Steal their elections. Bribe their media. Bribe the teachers. Bribe the musicians.
Bribe the military. Invest billions of dollars in a long-running color revolution.
As USAID documents will reveal, all this started in 2003 as the US State Department persuaded Ukraine they could poke the bear and expect Western backup "to the last man." Which means when it's all over, there will only be one Ukrainian male left alive. No one really thought about that because the slogans all sounded so inspiring.
"The campaign is an American creation, a sophisticated and brilliantly conceived exercise in Western branding and mass marketing," The Guardian's Ian Traynor wrote of the 2004 upheaval in November that year.
How Much Did the "Orange Revolution" Cost?
The US and its allies reportedly spent $65–$100 million over two years to support Viktor Yushchenko-led opposition, with much of the funding allegedly covert and funneled through NGOs.
The US State Department:
in FY2003 and FY2004 officially allocated $188.5 million and $143.47 million, respectively, for "assistance programs" in Ukraine
$54.7 million (FY2003) and $34.11 million (FY2004) went specifically to "democracy programs" in Ukraine on the eve of the 2004 election
"Democracy program" funds were used for electoral and government reform, independent media, political development, and training for administrators, lobbyists, and NGOs. The money was channeled through the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the Eurasia Foundation, National Endowment for Democracy (NED), US Embassy in Kiev, and others.
He denounces the UK government for forcing it on his platform.
“Call them out for the anti-White racists they are every time they do it,” he writes.
He is exposing the rigged game where European heritage is the sole permissible target of censorship, and he puts forth demands:
“Anti-White, anti-male discrimination ends now.”
Writes Malen Manya, "Musk has bluntly declared “a police state” — a prison island where dissent against the anti-White regime is criminalized, and the apparatus of control turns Britons into inmates in their own homeland. In his recent salvo on December 4, echoing the outrage over tyrannical crackdowns on free speech and protest, Musk amplified the truth: the UK has devolved into a surveillance nightmare, jailing citizens for memes, posts, and thoughts that challenge the multicultural flood eroding European identity. This isn’t hyperbole; it’s the grim reality where “hate speech” laws serve as shackles, selectively enforced to muzzle White ...
What Else Do We Have to Live For But Protesting Moral Authority?
"A macrosocial cluster B crisis is ripping this nation apart because Leftism has hijacked the minds of progressive females who then LARP out dangerous Gnostic heroic delusions."
— JD Haltigan
ICE Firearms and Use of Force Documents Page 12
D. Use of Deadly Force
3) Authorized Officers may use deadly force only when the officer has a reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of serious bodily injury or death to the officer or to another person.