We explore real-life reformation here in this informed, online community.
Recounts Attorney Robert Barnes,
"Before her nomination, I suggested that Amy Coney Barrett would not defend Trump or populist causes on a range of important topics. She would not help out in the election. She would not be a reliable vote on vaccines and related issues. She would not be a reliable voice on populist issues in general. I was accused of being a traitor. I was accused of having secret agendas. All that nonsense. Guess who the fourth vote was that was not there to take up the election cases--even the ones after the J6 issues to at least correct the next election? Amy Coney Barrett! Who is it that has refused to rule positively on any major vaccine issue for the most part? Amy Coney Barrett. Who is the one who did not join the majority on the election decision? Amy Coney Barrett."
Barnes further describes her decision to not adjudicate the Government/Big Tech censorship issue.
"She played Pontius Pilate. Washed her hands of the responsibility to adjudicate by citing "standing," telling the plaintiffs whose First Amendment rights were violated, that they had no standing to bring a suit."
It looks like it.
Nothing has happened in Ukraine since 2007 without the direction of the US deep state, overseen by The US State Department. Watch the following developments over the next two weeks and see what you can discern.
The New York Times has the green light to report on war atrocities committed by Ukrainian troops against Russian soldiers and civilians in Kursk. Organized citizen peace groups in Kiev have the green light to publicly protest. A power higher than Zelensky has ordered the army not to abuse or fire on the protesters. These represent major policy reversals that could very shortly result in the removal of the illegitimate president Zelensky.
Ninth Circuit Decision is Win for Second Amendment
Affirming the district court’s grant of a permanent injunction, the panel held that California’s ammunition background check regime, which requires firearm owners to complete background checks before each ammunition purchase, facially violates the Second Amendment. The panel applied the two-step framework set forth in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), in assessing plaintiffs’ Second Amendment challenge.
Applying the first step, the panel held that California’s ammunition background check regime implicates the plain text of the Second Amendment because the regime meaningfully constrains the right to keep operable arms.
Applying the second step, the panel held that the government failed to carry its burden of showing that California’s ammunition background check regime “is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.” The historical analogues ...
"We live in an age of science and of abounding accumulation of material things. These did not create our Declaration. Our Declaration created them.
"The things of the spirit come first. Unless we cling to that, all our material prosperity, overwhelming though it may appear, will turn to a barren sceptre in our grasp. If we are to maintain the great heritage which has been bequeathed to us, we must be like-minded as the fathers who created it. We must not sink into a pagan materialism. We must cultivate the reverence which they had for the things that are holy. We must follow the spiritual and moral leadership which they showed."
Calvin Coolidge, 1926
