We explore real-life reformation here in this informed, online community.
It's the kind of historic document which could be made to disappear. You might need it with the next "Disease X" outbreak.
This legal opinion dates to the hot controversy in 2021 about putting Covid patients on respirators and giving them Remdesivir (a lethal protocol) or simply treating patients at home with the proven pharmaceuticals hydroxy or ivermectin. The government said the latter was deadly and to be avoided. The Nebraska AG office simply reviewed all the science, all the political hype, and showed how the government was misleading people away from an easy, proven, inexpensive, treatment.
This document has protected those careful doctors and patients who bucked the government mandates and went with real science and showed the rest of the country how to deal with Covid responsibly.
Precious in the sight of the LORD Is the death of His godly ones.
Psalm 116:15
Rod Dreher asks, "I don’t understand why the government doesn’t deploy the army and shoot rioters until they stop. Philippe Lemoine, a Frenchman, says it’s not that simple."
Excerpt:
"We have let things rot for so long that, at this point, relying primarily on force to restore order would require a degree of violence far greater than what people realize and what is politically feasible.
It's possible to contain a riot using only moderate force when the number of police officers is high relative to the number of rioters, but when riots are so widespread and involve so many people because you have allowed this kind of things to happen for so long, that's just not possible and you have to use extreme violence to make up for the lack of manpower.
I know people on the Internet will say that it doesn't matter and that we should just do it, but the reality is that most of the people in charge are not prepared to use that kind of force and neither would most ordinary people if they saw ...
Even Marine Le Pen’s recent statements track this line: personal Islamic practice is compatible with the Republic; replacing French law with Sharia is not. French Muslims who are simply citizens practicing their "religious faith" “have no reason to worry” about a Le Pen election victory.
But can one be a practicing Muslim without demanding and practicing Sharia?
