Most Western constitutions were drafted to rest on Biblical foundations which acknowledge the will of God for families, churches and civil governments. Today the drivers of drastic constitutional overhaul are re-writing the language with the obsessive revolutionary aim to dismantle those Biblical theological foundations.
Here’s an example to watch:
On Friday March 8th, revolutionary anti-Christian bureaucrats in Ireland are demanding that the people show up at the polls to approve some new constitutional language which will gut the importance and protection of family and motherhood from national life.
Fortunately, the people can vote to keep the original language. But the media is urging them to scrap it.
Read the original language here and you will see immediately why the revolutionaries want to mutate it:
1° The State recognises the Family as the natural primary and fundamental unit group of Society, and as a moral institution possessing inalienable and imprescriptible rights, antecedent and superior to all positive law.
2° The State, therefore, guarantees to protect the Family in its constitution and authority, as the necessary basis of social order and as indispensable to the welfare of the Nation and the State.
[That ‘necessary basis of social order’ is based on marriage, which is why:]
1° The State pledges itself to guard with special care the institution of Marriage, on which the Family is founded, and to protect it against attack.
Well, the attack came, the State did not obey constitutional law, and now the people in this referendum are the final protection against the attack. What will they do on March 8th?
“I do not say that democracy has been more pernicious on the whole, and in the long run, than monarchy or aristocracy. Democracy has never been and never can be so durable as aristocracy or monarchy; but while it lasts, it is more bloody than either. … Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. It is in vain to say that democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious, or less avaricious than aristocracy or monarchy. It is not true, in fact, and nowhere appears in history. Those passions are the same in all men, under all forms of simple government, and when unchecked, produce the same effects of fraud, violence, and cruelty. When clear prospects are opened before vanity, pride, avarice, or ambition, for their easy gratification, it is hard for the most considerate philosophers and the most conscientious moralists to resist the temptation. Individuals have conquered ...
Writes Laurence Vance, "Here are the things that Pete Hegseth should have said about the military. Anything less is just death and destruction as usual with a little more masculinity and a little less wokeness:
The military will no longer fight wars that are not constitutionally declared.
The military will no longer serve as the president’s personal attack force.
The military will no longer police the world.
The military will no longer fight unjust wars.
The military will no longer make widows and orphans.
The military will no longer carry out reckless, belligerent, and meddling foreign policy.
The military will no longer station troops all over the world.
The military will stop helping to create terrorists, insurgents, and militants.
The military will stop going where they have no business going.
The military will no longer invade other countries.
The military will no longer fight unnecessary wars.
The military will no longer pretend to defend our freedoms.
The military will close all of its foreign...