Most Western constitutions were drafted to rest on Biblical foundations which acknowledge the will of God for families, churches and civil governments. Today the drivers of drastic constitutional overhaul are re-writing the language with the obsessive revolutionary aim to dismantle those Biblical theological foundations.
Here’s an example to watch:
On Friday March 8th, revolutionary anti-Christian bureaucrats in Ireland are demanding that the people show up at the polls to approve some new constitutional language which will gut the importance and protection of family and motherhood from national life.
Fortunately, the people can vote to keep the original language. But the media is urging them to scrap it.
Read the original language here and you will see immediately why the revolutionaries want to mutate it:
1° The State recognises the Family as the natural primary and fundamental unit group of Society, and as a moral institution possessing inalienable and imprescriptible rights, antecedent and superior to all positive law.
2° The State, therefore, guarantees to protect the Family in its constitution and authority, as the necessary basis of social order and as indispensable to the welfare of the Nation and the State.
[That ‘necessary basis of social order’ is based on marriage, which is why:]
1° The State pledges itself to guard with special care the institution of Marriage, on which the Family is founded, and to protect it against attack.
Well, the attack came, the State did not obey constitutional law, and now the people in this referendum are the final protection against the attack. What will they do on March 8th?
“I write books to educate myself"
Paul Johnson (1928–2023), the British historian and author, wrote more than 50 books over his lifetime.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.297297/gov.uscourts.dcd.297297.1.0.pdf
Mishandling national defense information. Very serious.
There are three ways the outlook could play out.
1. The polls and analysts are largely accurate.
a. House: 233 D - 202 R; Senate: 52 D - 48 R
b. Recent polling errors have been greater in the presidential elections while midterms - on the whole - have been more accurate (Silver Bulletin). If largely accurate, Democrats would win a majority of similar size to the 2018 and 2006 midterms and gain a narrow Senate majority.
2. The polls and analysts underestimate Republicans by a normal polling error.
a. House: 221 D - 214 R; Senate: 51 R - 49 D
b. Some of the biggest polling errors this century occurred in reliably red states and districts that underestimate Republican support (The Economist). Given where the competitive races are located this year, another underestimation would be enough to keep Republicans in control of the Senate and to have Democratic House margins in the single digits.
3. The polls and analysts underestimate Democrats by a normal polling error.
a. House: 238 D - 197 R;...