We explore real-life reformation here in this informed, online community.
Most Western constitutions were drafted to rest on Biblical foundations which acknowledge the will of God for families, churches and civil governments. Today the drivers of drastic constitutional overhaul are re-writing the language with the obsessive revolutionary aim to dismantle those Biblical theological foundations.
Here’s an example to watch:
On Friday March 8th, revolutionary anti-Christian bureaucrats in Ireland are demanding that the people show up at the polls to approve some new constitutional language which will gut the importance and protection of family and motherhood from national life.
Fortunately, the people can vote to keep the original language. But the media is urging them to scrap it.
Read the original language here and you will see immediately why the revolutionaries want to mutate it:
1° The State recognises the Family as the natural primary and fundamental unit group of Society, and as a moral institution possessing inalienable and imprescriptible rights, antecedent and superior to all positive law.
2° The State, therefore, guarantees to protect the Family in its constitution and authority, as the necessary basis of social order and as indispensable to the welfare of the Nation and the State.
[That ‘necessary basis of social order’ is based on marriage, which is why:]
1° The State pledges itself to guard with special care the institution of Marriage, on which the Family is founded, and to protect it against attack.
Well, the attack came, the State did not obey constitutional law, and now the people in this referendum are the final protection against the attack. What will they do on March 8th?
Can we avoid entangling foreign alliances?
“A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter, without adequate inducement or justification.”
--- George Washington, Farewell Address.
Mark Sheboda concludes,
"The US/Israel realized:
that their regime change plans were not coming to fruition,
that the Iranian govt had more support and stronger foundations than they had believed,
that Israeli air defense was collapsing/exhausted and
that an attrition war of long range strike was going to go badly for Israel.
And Trump began to get freaked out over the rising price of oil with the Iranian threat of closing the strait of Hormuz.
So they wrapped it up, declared victory, and demanded a ceasefire.
Iran agreed because they too have been badly shaken through Israeli covert warfare and their own air defense all but collapsed.
The can will only be kicked down the road, and both sides will start rebuilding, and making preparations and plans for the next round, the next war. This was only a skirmish at the end of the day ..."
Zohran Mamdani's victory is an indication of how much of a victory 9/11 was for the global jihad. Today, a Muslim who wants to "globalize the intifada," which is a call for jihad, will be the city's next mayor. This shows the power of the "Islamophobia" narrative and the cost of stigmatizing and silencing those who were calling attention to the jihad threat.
The demographics of New York will change, as non-Muslims move out and more far-leftists and Muslims move in. There will be increasingly aggressive calls for application of more Sharia provisions. In other words, if you want to see what is about to happen to New York City, look at what has happened to London over the last decade.
--Robert Spencer
