We explore real-life reformation here in this informed, online community.
Back in the ’70s, school kids were taught to chant “It’s Only a Clump of Cells” to depersonalize a growing human child in the womb. The ‘70s kids came to believe that lie, and then use that slogan to justify aborting their own children as they became adults, parents, politicians, and voters. And then the lie was repeated for two generations.
Today the hot slogan is “No Human Being is Illegal!”
It is a popular virtue-signaling slogan, now being used to justify uncontrolled illegal immigration. If Biden tries to federalize and then control a sovereign state’s National Guard, he will need to enshrine that false slogan as truth to justify twisting Title 10, Section 333.
This law allows the president to federalize a state’s National Guard when “any part or class of its people” are “deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law” when “the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection.”
In this case, Biden would argue that illegal aliens, even though guilty of criminal acts, are a “class of its people,” which is to say they are American and Texas citizens and, further, that illegally crossing the border is a right “named in the Constitution and secured by law.”
This is how lies become the foundation of law. People first must believe the lies. Then weaponized courts codify the lies as truth. And then culture becomes death-culture.
Precious in the sight of the LORD Is the death of His godly ones.
Psalm 116:15
Rod Dreher asks, "I don’t understand why the government doesn’t deploy the army and shoot rioters until they stop. Philippe Lemoine, a Frenchman, says it’s not that simple."
Excerpt:
"We have let things rot for so long that, at this point, relying primarily on force to restore order would require a degree of violence far greater than what people realize and what is politically feasible.
It's possible to contain a riot using only moderate force when the number of police officers is high relative to the number of rioters, but when riots are so widespread and involve so many people because you have allowed this kind of things to happen for so long, that's just not possible and you have to use extreme violence to make up for the lack of manpower.
I know people on the Internet will say that it doesn't matter and that we should just do it, but the reality is that most of the people in charge are not prepared to use that kind of force and neither would most ordinary people if they saw ...
Even Marine Le Pen’s recent statements track this line: personal Islamic practice is compatible with the Republic; replacing French law with Sharia is not. French Muslims who are simply citizens practicing their "religious faith" “have no reason to worry” about a Le Pen election victory.
But can one be a practicing Muslim without demanding and practicing Sharia?
