We explore real-life reformation here in this informed, online community.
No. Explains Robert Barnes: "The United States Supreme Court long ago recognized that any attempt to punish speech “outside the court room which comment upon a pending case” would “weigh heavily” toward unconstitutionality. Bridges v. State of Cal., 314 U.S. 252, 260 (1941). Only speech that presented a “clear and present danger” to the ability of the courts to function could even be considered for proscription or punishment. Bridges v. State of Cal., 314 U.S. 252, 262 (1941). Indeed: “what finally emerges from the clear and present danger cases is a working principle that the substantive evil must be extremely serious and the degree of imminence extremely high before utterances can be punished.” Bridges v. State of Cal., 314 U.S. 252, 263 (1941)."
Better a poor and wise youth Than an old and foolish king who will be admonished no more. Ecclesiastes 4:13
Question:
Or what king, going to make war against another king, does not sit down first and consider whether he is able with ten thousand to meet him who comes against him with twenty thousand? Luke14:31
Answer:
A king who watches too much FOX TV, reads too many Marvel comics, pays attention to the New York Times, and watches too many Hollywood political thrillers.
The narrow strait is the most important chokepoint for the world's oil supply. Some 21 million barrels — or $1.2 billion worth of oil — pass through the strait every day.
Will a closed Strait hurt Iran? In terms of international oil sales, yes, but in terms of daily life, no. Iran pumps 3.5 million barrels of crude oil per day. The situation at this hour:
