We explore real-life reformation here in this informed, online community.
Nigel Farage has been called the Donald Trump of the United Kingdom. He's an outspoken opponent of illegal immigration, the EU, fiat currency, unconstitutional governance, and corruption in government courts. The establishment hates him.
Earlier this year the banking system made it clear they could make an example of him, presumably as a warning to other conservative citizens. Banks proceeded to cancel him, silence him, hinder his ability to be a political leader, and ultimately tried to run him out of his own country. They simply de-banked him by cancelling his bank accounts. But Farage did not leave the country; he hired attorneys and fought back.
Recent legal inquiries show deceitful, fraudulent, and secret dealings by the banks. NatWest is the first to issue a formal apology, below.
Look at this legal definition of gambling: "Gambling is when a person bets or risks something of value (like money) based on a chance outcome that is OUT OF THEIR CONTROL OR INFLUENCE with the understanding that they will either gain increased value or lose their original value determined by the specific outcome."
Examples of this is are the stock market and a government lottery, advertising "get rich quick" opportunities. This is also called a tax on the stupid.
Kalshi and other betting platforms offer predictions on likely political, geopolitical, cultural and economic events in the real world.
Perceptive cultural analysts look beyond fake media narratives to discern outcomes which become obvious to them for clear evidentiary reasons.
While individual payouts aren't always publicly detailed due to privacy, aggregated reports and interviews highlight several notable six- and seven-figure earnings:
- A professional trader accumulated nearly $1 million in total profits across ...
So why did the aristocratic authors of the US Constitution leave it out?
“For power is a very intoxicating thing, and has made many a man do unwarrantable actions, which before he was invested with it, he had no thoughts of doing.”
-- Amicus, Antifederalist No. 53
