We explore real-life reformation here in this informed, online community.
The Protestant theologian R.J. Rushdoony wrote,
“History has never been dominated by majorities, but only by dedicated minorities who stand unconditionally on their faith.”
At the moment, the domination comes from hard-left media elites and government agencies who monitor your DMs because they don’t want you to influence anyone in even the smallest way. Their faith is in unstoppable social evolution run by a centralized government.
But there are a lot more of you than there are of their dedicated minority. Over 250,000 of you were cancelled by big tech for what you said, for what you were dedicated to, and for standing for something truthful.
At the moment they still have the upper hand. They are further weaponizing their upper hand. Which means it’s risky for you to attempt any influence on the direction of history. If you try it, be sure you’re standing unconditionally on the right faith. Be sure you can reliably depend on rock-solid truth, which is found solely in the specific promises of Jesus Christ, which are clearly laid out in the Bible. No other faith is worth the risk you undertake in dissent or defiance.
Rod Dreher asks, "I don’t understand why the government doesn’t deploy the army and shoot rioters until they stop. Philippe Lemoine, a Frenchman, says it’s not that simple."
Excerpt:
"We have let things rot for so long that, at this point, relying primarily on force to restore order would require a degree of violence far greater than what people realize and what is politically feasible.
It's possible to contain a riot using only moderate force when the number of police officers is high relative to the number of rioters, but when riots are so widespread and involve so many people because you have allowed this kind of things to happen for so long, that's just not possible and you have to use extreme violence to make up for the lack of manpower.
I know people on the Internet will say that it doesn't matter and that we should just do it, but the reality is that most of the people in charge are not prepared to use that kind of force and neither would most ordinary people if they saw ...
Even Marine Le Pen’s recent statements track this line: personal Islamic practice is compatible with the Republic; replacing French law with Sharia is not. French Muslims who are simply citizens practicing their "religious faith" “have no reason to worry” about a Le Pen election victory.
But can one be a practicing Muslim without demanding and practicing Sharia?
